Pronin: I don't want to sound like an asshole but I want to critique a little, the face and head could use a bit more work and there's too much glow effect. It's fur, there shouldn't be that much or none at all. Other than that, it's fine as far as porn goes. Although, you might want to upload these on another site rather than here.
Rick2tails: if she was purposely being lewd or having sex itd be porn. this is just pin up material if youre not willing to call it artistic seminudity.
Rick2tails: we all do have different lines .thats why in that supreme court case the justice was quoted as obscenity is "I know it when i see it" as in ones preconcieved notions of what is right and what is wrong and that its so obvious it doesnt even need to be adressed or justified.Like how at one time blacks could date whites or women couldnt vote or homosexuality was a deviant mental disorder that needed to be punished etc
unknown_victor: @PermanentFace: @Rick2tails: This was the idea is had, I wanted to see where the community drew the line, so far the images haven't been removed so I think this is the limit of what's 'acceptable' in the community, however like what Rick has mentioned this line will most likely move forward in the future.
unknown_victor: @Pronin: my point is anything can be fetish material, ANYTHING.
Someone could have a sexual desire towards clothing, so because that's fetish material to them doesn't mean it's fetish material for everyone else.
AlTan: @unknown_victor: I can't agree with you more: anything can be fetish. But on rhe other hand, internet conclude a lot of fetish-theme groups. More than need (as i think), and there are no one reasons to make one more.
Describe This Image As Dramatically As Possible
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Someone could have a sexual desire towards clothing, so because that's fetish material to them doesn't mean it's fetish material for everyone else.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply