Kibermozgai: I was blessed by Kaz to post some ai art for firing up a big fight for... I mean... For starting a civil discussion about ai art being ok on prequel fanart or not

vsauce4: I see some imperfections, but holy crap thats amazing (if it was done by a human)

damrok4321: Probably shouldn't tag yourself as an artist if it was generated, but that's all I've got to say.

NewFace: I look forward to calmly hashing out the costs and benefits of machine learning processes in human society, and especially to our inevitable unanimous conclusion which will undoubtedly form a foundation for all future AI legislation around the globe.

Rick2tails: if this is ai art one cant be called the artist.It is really a mash up of art others already drew. having said that.For AI art this isnt bad. no 2 mouths,14 fingers per hand,4 legs or pupils outside of eyes here like so many ai garbage.

vsauce4: @Rick2tails: yeah thats basically AI right now, it collects data from multiple sources and jams it all together. And I highly agree - though I cant find the right words - AI should not be here, or should be very limited. It would be so boring and underwhelming if it wasnt done by an actual person.

vsauce4: @Rick2tails: In other words, there's no emotion... It's all machine lol. I would really hate to see that happen.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: I have toyed with AI generation and got some pretty good Katia stuff on par, but I decided not to keep any of em :p though its interested to experiment with.

Kibermozgai: @Rick2tails: I feel like tagging an artist still be a good thing to do, as long as ai tag still there as well, so nobody gets fooled. Since uploader and the one who actually toyed with gen could be different persons and because even with generated arts you can guess who was creating it by looking on the amount of details, used styles and efforts (or lack of it) putted to fix certain gen's messes. Let's says that author in that case is more like a quality control dude, who still have personal preferences and still could be distinguished from other quality control dudes. Saying that, just like some enjoy works of specific real artists some folks may prefer to see/hide works of a specific qcd standing behind crazy 8-fingers loving robot.

APayne1776_TheThird: Honestly don't mind AI Art. As long as you acknowledge that it is AI Art and you don't claim to have drawn it yourself.

Zargothrax: As far as I know, legislation regarding ownership of AI art goes like this: As an artist, you own the parts of a painting that were actually painted by you. If you use AI to generate a background, and then paint a character in front of it, then, legally, you'd be the owner of the character only. If you only made a single brushstroke on an AI art, then you only own that. And if there were no "manual" steps involved, then you own nothing. In other words, steps performed to alter how the AI generates the art, do not give any ownership to the person, regardless of how much work was involved (and if I'm wrong, I hope I managed to at least invoke Cunningham's law). As such, I'd also not list the "AI operator" under the artist as tag, unless they made significant changes to the art themselves.

We should also distinguish between "AI art" and "AI assisted" art. To me at least, "AI assisted" suggests that a large part of the painting (if not most of it) was made by a human. In other words, the AI only assisted.

Anyway, nice looking Katia. I've noticed it before, that most of the time, AI makes surprisingly pleasant looking lighting.

Snek_Inna_Tenk: Yeah, I’m going to give a hard pass on these machine-generated images on an art booru. Such things don’t belong alongside actual artwork, and any site that allows the two to mix is simply not worth using. I’m here to appreciate the work of actual human beings, not a deluge of mechanical sludge. Especially nowadays, we need places for art that we can actually trust, since it’s gotten harder to tell what’s real and what’s fake at a glance now.