TheGibusGuy: I commissioned MythRava for this! I wanted her to look like she was feeling pretty. :3

Here's the little doodle I gave for reference.

Rick2tails: very cute!

DearFox: It seems that this is not the maximum resolution that is available. Perhaps it can be updated?

TheGibusGuy: @DearFox: This was the version I get sent over in my Twitter dms, I could ask again though.

TheGibusGuy: @DearFox: Extremely high res version available here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17vW8UdRdjN0ygxBymKb0yK_58c66OgmE/view?usp=sharing

TheGibusGuy: @TheGibusGuy: Whoops, here it is as a clickable link.

Jig_Bigga: @TheGibusGuy: 8118x19911? YOU WEREN’T KIDDING!

Radiocaster: That's the kind of resolution that makes programs warn you before opening the file lmao

Raywingale: I don't think such a high resolution is necessary for drawing, at least not for characters

Radiocaster: @Raywingale: I can understand it since the piece was done in a very painterly style. It also explains why they didn't bother sending over the full resolution version. To that end, I wonder why they sent the max resolution version and yet still exported it as a jpeg.

Raywingale: @Radiocaster: There are no small details here that would require enlarging the canvas to view them. So it was possible to do this in a much lower resolution without completely losing the quality of the artwork. And it wouldn't even have to be scaled down. As for jpg, if the artist exported this art to png, the file would weigh more than 300 MB.