Mahyar: I swear, if I had created and uploaded this artifact, the administrative organisms (especially JohnnyCheeseDog, a designation that appears to have been generated by a confused AI) would have erased it from existence immediately. The entire booru would then collectively ask: "What am I witnessing?"
Mahyar: Observation complete. This GIF has increased my confidence in the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEMT) hypothesis. Another fascinating discovery about the Homo sapiens species.
Mahyar: The human brain has a PhD in pattern recognition... unfortunately, half of it is dedicated to spotting dicks where there aren't any.
The primate reproductive system has detected a suspicious shape and immediately launched emergency protocols. Another masterpiece of millions of years of evolution.
Mahyar: If you want my personal opinion... this artwork is insanely intense! She's such a goofy and lovable character, which makes the contrast even crazier. Seeing such a cute character in such a brutal scene is honestly something else.
Anyway, don't take this comment the wrong way! I swear I'm just appreciating the crazy contrast here, not secretly starting a villain arc.
Mahyar: Such a clean sense of space and movement. The perspective is rendered with a clarity that speaks for itself. A moment on paper, shaped with a discipline and confidence that are genuinely remarkable.
Mahyar: Note: The meme I uploaded earlier was not intended to reference any individual.
It was simply a general commentary on the tagging and censorship mechanics of the site.
Mahyar: If it’s garbage, then yeah… I guess I’m just another member of the Win95 Paint crowd.
If it’s average, whatever.
If it’s good, then fine, not bad.
But honestly, knowing my track record, I once left a highly overconfident comment under my first FanArt, while the FanArt itself wasn’t even that good, and I was basically just spamming overly optimistic text underneath it… and only later started figuring out how this Booru actually works.
I should probably avoid drowning everything in emojis, avoid messy commentary, and not “attack primitive brains” (what you’d basically call tribal defensive reaction in psychology). Normal criticism is fine, but unnecessary noise just creates enemies for no reason.
And yeah, I basically ended up creating enemies for myself, a lot of the users who were there at the time, especially the uploader of the image, @Ofeerz . Kazerad was there too, and since that day he hasn’t replied to any of my messages anymore, like some kind of childish silent grudge.
Could be nothing, could just be silence, but it still sticks in my head more than it should.
That meme I uploaded earlier, the one the admins deleted, had a point too: any user in this Booru can basically hide explicit content under a “Trojan horse” of questionable censorship.
Mahyar: @hexTerminator: The image was uploaded as a UI suggestion for the Fan Art Booru button, like other fan art button entries that users have posted across the site, same as a bunch of other user submissions floating around the site.
Some of them are legit pixel-art masterpieces, some look like MS Paint crimes against geometry, and all of them get treated like equal candidates in the same rotating UI pool.
The whole system feels like a 2006-era Booru site running inside a cracked Windows XP install, half-stuck between Flash animations and broken CSS, with a dial-up connection that still has PTSD every time someone refreshes the page.
Automation is unlikely. Consistency isn’t part of the specification. It’s just whatever survives the upload queue and decides to show itself next.
Anatomy, microbiology, and basic risk assessment don't care about anyone's evening plans.
Maybe keep the pineapple on a plate and add some wild honey instead. Humans have an impressive habit of using body parts for purposes they weren't designed for, then wondering why the emergency department exists.
Reducing the size of pineapple does NOT resolve the fundamental biomechanical and microbiological risks associated with anorectal foreign body insertion
The distal gastrointestinal tract is not sterile It contains dense microbial communities including Escherichia coli Enterococcus spp Bacteroides fragilis group Clostridium spp Prevotella spp
If mucosal integrity is disrupted abrasion laceration or micro-tears endogenous bacteria can translocate into deeper tissues or bloodstream leading to localized abscess formation severe soft tissue infection bacteremia sepsis septic shock in extreme cases
Simultaneously the surface of plant material including pineapple may carry environmental microorganisms depending on handling soil exposure and contamination compounding infection risk
Dual contamination mechanism:
1 External microbes enter damaged tissue via foreign object trauma
2 Internal gut flora such as E. coli and Bacteroides spp enter sterile compartments through the same lesions increasing infection probability and severity
If anorectal trauma occurs contamination is not theoretical It is immediate and predictable due to constant commensal gut flora
If gastrointestinal bacteria reach oral or non native regions exposure may lead to gastroenteritis diarrhea abdominal cramping vomiting and systemic infection in vulnerable hosts
Representative organisms include Escherichia coli Enterococcus faecalis Bacteroides fragilis Clostridium difficile and other dysbiosis associated pathogens
The gastrointestinal tract is a one way biological system ingestion digestion absorption elimination
It is not designed for reverse contamination cycles or foreign object trauma dynamics
The anus is a controlled exit pathway engineered for waste elimination not for foreign object entry though human behavior occasionally ignores basic anatomical design constraints
Tissue injury plus microbial exposure leads to infection amplification cascade standard medical pathology not theory
Why introduce trauma microbial exchange and infection risk into a biologically optimized exit pathway when Pineapple is already a food source designed for oral ingestion and safe metabolic processing
Consume it as fruit
Not a microbiological incident vector!
Mahyar: @Juice_WRLD Define ‘dare.’ The referenced subject is a static RGB pixel matrix emitted by a Liquid Crystal Display. It possesses no agency, no threat potential, and no capacity to induce a physiological fear response.
Mahyar: LAB REPORT: EXTREME MEDICAL REALITY EDITION
Clinical Reality: Level: Surgical Pathology
The human or anthro anorectal system is a fragile biological structure, not a mechanical loading port.
The anal canal is composed of stratified squamous mucosa, transitioning to simple columnar epithelium in the rectum. These layers tear under pressures far below what is required to insert a rigid, spiked botanical mass such as Ananas comosus (pineapple).
The region contains the internal anal sphincter (smooth muscle), external anal sphincter (striated muscle), levator ani complex, and the hemorrhoidal vascular plexus.
Attempting insertion of a pineapple may result in:
The rectum and colon naturally contain billions of microorganisms, including:
- Escherichia coli
- Enterococcus species
- Bacteroides species
- Clostridium species
- Prevotella species
In addition, the surface of fruits and other environmental objects may carry soil-borne or environmental microorganisms depending on handling and sanitation conditions.
When tissue is torn, these microorganisms can gain access to deeper tissues, the bloodstream, or the abdominal cavity, causing:
If fecal bacteria are transferred to the mouth, they may cause gastroenteritis, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, vomiting, and infection.
No biological organism, human, animal, or anthro, possesses "tractor-grade elasticity," "industrial-gasket sphincters," or "polycarbonate intestines."
These are R34 myths with no anatomical, physiological, or microbiological basis.
Hygiene Reality Check: Microbiology Edition
All digestive systems produce fecal matter containing Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Clostridium, Prevotella, and numerous other members of the normal gut microbiota.
If fecal bacteria are transferred to the mouth, they may cause gastroenteritis, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal infections.
Fiction does not override physiology.
Bodies are not sterile.
Waste is not magical.
Hygiene is not optional.
Katia Managan: Biological Reality Edition
Katia has a digestive system, not divine armor.
She has fragile mucosa, not a reinforced tractor seal.
She has soft tissue, not a bulletproof polymer tube.
She has gut bacteria, and if those bacteria reach someone's mouth, there is a good chance of gastrointestinal illness. They may also cause diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, and infection.
And she would not realistically attempt something as dangerous as inserting a pineapple unless she were severely intoxicated and exercising extremely poor judgment.
Even in that scenario, the most likely outcome would be superficial external injury, pain, skin contamination, and an immediate failure of the idea long before successful insertion became anatomically possible.
Even the dumbest fictional characters, yes, even Katia Managan, cannot override anatomy, physics, or microbiology.
Sources: Human anatomy, colorectal surgery, microbiology, infectious disease pathology, and basic reality.
Mahyar: I recommend researching the Flammenwerfer 35. Developed by the German army during the Second World War, this flamethrower projected fire up to twenty-five meters through its elongated tube.
Mahyar: The question of whether wearable technology could one day enable a person to ignite fire from their hands, as depicted in fiction, is not entirely absurd from a purely engineering perspective. However, it demands a sober evaluation of feasibility, safety, and consequence.
In principle, a sufficiently miniaturized ignition and fuel-delivery system could be integrated into a wearable device. One might imagine a compact mechanism, perhaps resembling a wristwatch, capable of producing a directed flame. Yet such a design would confront immediate constraints: fuel storage limitations, thermal insulation requirements, control precision, and the ever-present risk of catastrophic malfunction.
The difficulty is not solely technological. It is ethical and practical. A device intended to project flame from the human body would, by definition, carry significant risk to the user and to others. Any failure in containment or regulation would result not in spectacle, but in injury.
Mahyar: @Makkon: For a first serious attempt, it is a starting point. I am eager to improve and learn. From your experience, do you think this is a good starting point for a beginner like me?
Mahyar: @Makkon: I have read your feedback carefully, and I understand your point.
You are right about my current level—this was my first serious attempt,
and there is still much to learn.
By “good,” I meant the effort I was able to make at this stage,
not a claim of quality.
I also recognize that I misjudged the context and tone.
I will take a step back, focus on improvement,
and let future work speak for itself.
Thank you for taking the time to offer detailed feedback.
Mahyar: @hexTerminator: Yes, I noticed it.
Only Katia’s tag is present…
We should perhaps add the descriptive one as well…
It will make it clearer for everyone…
Mahyar: If I were genuinely elite—or merely appearing so—there would be no reason for me to participate in a booru of such degraded quality, reminiscent of 2008 graphics.
Why waste time debating with users who instinctively oppose guidance and recoil from formal discourse?
While chronologically mature, their reasoning is arrested at the level of a five-year-old.
This statement is analytical, not an assertion of superiority.
Mahyar: @AMKitsune:
Thank you for your warning. I have tried to make clear that I bear no ill-will, yet my tone was misread.
I did not intend to appear elitist. Discussing neurobiology is not elitist. My jokes were not malicious. Suggestions I offered were not rude.
If I commented previously, it was out of ignorance of the sensitivity of users here. Humor in my view; insult in theirs. I accept my role as a clown.
Now I respond in the most detached, mechanical tone. Users here are delicate: critique scares them, jokes upset them.
Understand this: stating ridicule was ineffective demonstrates resilience. Attempting to make my first work good does not imply superiority.
I never claimed to be superior or that my art is the best. Past humorous tones are retired.
Detachment is necessary; this mechanical tone is not elitism. Feedback is welcome; it drives growth even if some react emotionally.
Mahyar: @AMKitsune:
Claiming my first drawing is good is not a statement of superiority.
The tone you perceive as cold is deliberate, a barrier against childish mockery.
Dramatic Descriptions
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
The primate reproductive system has detected a suspicious shape and immediately launched emergency protocols. Another masterpiece of millions of years of evolution.
- Reply
- Reply
Anyway, don't take this comment the wrong way! I swear I'm just appreciating the crazy contrast here, not secretly starting a villain arc.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
It was simply a general commentary on the tagging and censorship mechanics of the site.
- Reply
If it’s average, whatever.
If it’s good, then fine, not bad.
But honestly, knowing my track record, I once left a highly overconfident comment under my first FanArt, while the FanArt itself wasn’t even that good, and I was basically just spamming overly optimistic text underneath it… and only later started figuring out how this Booru actually works.
I should probably avoid drowning everything in emojis, avoid messy commentary, and not “attack primitive brains” (what you’d basically call tribal defensive reaction in psychology). Normal criticism is fine, but unnecessary noise just creates enemies for no reason.
And yeah, I basically ended up creating enemies for myself, a lot of the users who were there at the time, especially the uploader of the image, @Ofeerz . Kazerad was there too, and since that day he hasn’t replied to any of my messages anymore, like some kind of childish silent grudge.
Could be nothing, could just be silence, but it still sticks in my head more than it should.
That meme I uploaded earlier, the one the admins deleted, had a point too: any user in this Booru can basically hide explicit content under a “Trojan horse” of questionable censorship.
- Reply
0 to 10, what’s the damage?
- Reply
Some of them are legit pixel-art masterpieces, some look like MS Paint crimes against geometry, and all of them get treated like equal candidates in the same rotating UI pool.
The whole system feels like a 2006-era Booru site running inside a cracked Windows XP install, half-stuck between Flash animations and broken CSS, with a dial-up connection that still has PTSD every time someone refreshes the page.
Automation is unlikely. Consistency isn’t part of the specification. It’s just whatever survives the upload queue and decides to show itself next.
- Reply
Anatomy, microbiology, and basic risk assessment don't care about anyone's evening plans.
Maybe keep the pineapple on a plate and add some wild honey instead. Humans have an impressive habit of using body parts for purposes they weren't designed for, then wondering why the emergency department exists.
- Reply
- Reply
Reducing the size of pineapple does NOT resolve the fundamental biomechanical and microbiological risks associated with anorectal foreign body insertion
The distal gastrointestinal tract is not sterile It contains dense microbial communities including Escherichia coli Enterococcus spp Bacteroides fragilis group Clostridium spp Prevotella spp
If mucosal integrity is disrupted abrasion laceration or micro-tears endogenous bacteria can translocate into deeper tissues or bloodstream leading to localized abscess formation severe soft tissue infection bacteremia sepsis septic shock in extreme cases
Simultaneously the surface of plant material including pineapple may carry environmental microorganisms depending on handling soil exposure and contamination compounding infection risk
Dual contamination mechanism:
1 External microbes enter damaged tissue via foreign object trauma
2 Internal gut flora such as E. coli and Bacteroides spp enter sterile compartments through the same lesions increasing infection probability and severity
If anorectal trauma occurs contamination is not theoretical It is immediate and predictable due to constant commensal gut flora
If gastrointestinal bacteria reach oral or non native regions exposure may lead to gastroenteritis diarrhea abdominal cramping vomiting and systemic infection in vulnerable hosts
Representative organisms include Escherichia coli Enterococcus faecalis Bacteroides fragilis Clostridium difficile and other dysbiosis associated pathogens
The gastrointestinal tract is a one way biological system ingestion digestion absorption elimination
It is not designed for reverse contamination cycles or foreign object trauma dynamics
The anus is a controlled exit pathway engineered for waste elimination not for foreign object entry though human behavior occasionally ignores basic anatomical design constraints
Tissue injury plus microbial exposure leads to infection amplification cascade standard medical pathology not theory
Why introduce trauma microbial exchange and infection risk into a biologically optimized exit pathway when Pineapple is already a food source designed for oral ingestion and safe metabolic processing
Consume it as fruit
Not a microbiological incident vector!
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Clinical Reality: Level: Surgical Pathology
The human or anthro anorectal system is a fragile biological structure, not a mechanical loading port.
The anal canal is composed of stratified squamous mucosa, transitioning to simple columnar epithelium in the rectum. These layers tear under pressures far below what is required to insert a rigid, spiked botanical mass such as Ananas comosus (pineapple).
The region contains the internal anal sphincter (smooth muscle), external anal sphincter (striated muscle), levator ani complex, and the hemorrhoidal vascular plexus.
Attempting insertion of a pineapple may result in:
- Severe mucosal laceration
- Sphincter injury
- Rectal wall perforation
- Fecal peritonitis
- Hemorrhagic shock
- Septicemia
- Multi-organ failure
The rectum and colon naturally contain billions of microorganisms, including:
- Escherichia coli
- Enterococcus species
- Bacteroides species
- Clostridium species
- Prevotella species
In addition, the surface of fruits and other environmental objects may carry soil-borne or environmental microorganisms depending on handling and sanitation conditions.
When tissue is torn, these microorganisms can gain access to deeper tissues, the bloodstream, or the abdominal cavity, causing:
- Severe soft-tissue infection
- Bacteremia
- Sepsis
- Septic shock
- Necrotizing infection
If fecal bacteria are transferred to the mouth, they may cause gastroenteritis, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, vomiting, and infection.
No biological organism, human, animal, or anthro, possesses "tractor-grade elasticity," "industrial-gasket sphincters," or "polycarbonate intestines."
These are R34 myths with no anatomical, physiological, or microbiological basis.
Hygiene Reality Check: Microbiology Edition
All digestive systems produce fecal matter containing Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Clostridium, Prevotella, and numerous other members of the normal gut microbiota.
If fecal bacteria are transferred to the mouth, they may cause gastroenteritis, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal infections.
Fiction does not override physiology.
Bodies are not sterile.
Waste is not magical.
Hygiene is not optional.
Katia Managan: Biological Reality Edition
Katia has a digestive system, not divine armor.
She has fragile mucosa, not a reinforced tractor seal.
She has soft tissue, not a bulletproof polymer tube.
She has gut bacteria, and if those bacteria reach someone's mouth, there is a good chance of gastrointestinal illness. They may also cause diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, and infection.
And she would not realistically attempt something as dangerous as inserting a pineapple unless she were severely intoxicated and exercising extremely poor judgment.
Even in that scenario, the most likely outcome would be superficial external injury, pain, skin contamination, and an immediate failure of the idea long before successful insertion became anatomically possible.
Even the dumbest fictional characters, yes, even Katia Managan, cannot override anatomy, physics, or microbiology.
Sources: Human anatomy, colorectal surgery, microbiology, infectious disease pathology, and basic reality.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
In principle, a sufficiently miniaturized ignition and fuel-delivery system could be integrated into a wearable device. One might imagine a compact mechanism, perhaps resembling a wristwatch, capable of producing a directed flame. Yet such a design would confront immediate constraints: fuel storage limitations, thermal insulation requirements, control precision, and the ever-present risk of catastrophic malfunction.
The difficulty is not solely technological. It is ethical and practical. A device intended to project flame from the human body would, by definition, carry significant risk to the user and to others. Any failure in containment or regulation would result not in spectacle, but in injury.
- Reply
- Reply
I will focus on fundamental drawing skills first and study the Ctrl+Paint materials you recommended.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
You are right about my current level—this was my first serious attempt,
and there is still much to learn.
By “good,” I meant the effort I was able to make at this stage,
not a claim of quality.
I also recognize that I misjudged the context and tone.
I will take a step back, focus on improvement,
and let future work speak for itself.
Thank you for taking the time to offer detailed feedback.
- Reply
Only Katia’s tag is present…
We should perhaps add the descriptive one as well…
It will make it clearer for everyone…
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
No further commentary is required; the skill is evident.
- Reply
Why waste time debating with users who instinctively oppose guidance and recoil from formal discourse?
While chronologically mature, their reasoning is arrested at the level of a five-year-old.
This statement is analytical, not an assertion of superiority.
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Thank you for your warning. I have tried to make clear that I bear no ill-will, yet my tone was misread.
I did not intend to appear elitist. Discussing neurobiology is not elitist. My jokes were not malicious. Suggestions I offered were not rude.
If I commented previously, it was out of ignorance of the sensitivity of users here. Humor in my view; insult in theirs. I accept my role as a clown.
Now I respond in the most detached, mechanical tone. Users here are delicate: critique scares them, jokes upset them.
Understand this: stating ridicule was ineffective demonstrates resilience. Attempting to make my first work good does not imply superiority.
I never claimed to be superior or that my art is the best. Past humorous tones are retired.
Detachment is necessary; this mechanical tone is not elitism. Feedback is welcome; it drives growth even if some react emotionally.
- Reply
Claiming my first drawing is good is not a statement of superiority.
The tone you perceive as cold is deliberate, a barrier against childish mockery.