compaqness: There seemed to have been a dispute over some tags on a couple of images and things got a bit out of hand... But it looks like things have been settled at least!
I didn't follow the whole conflict over whether or not that Rajirra image should be labeled "questionable", but I can appreciate the fact that people were writing paragraphs and paragraphs of text analyzing how questionable cat boobs are.
SameButDifferent: @FilthyPaladin Serious answer: Probably no need to put the Pineapple into effect if those cold blooded lumps are exposed but not in a provocative manner. You know, with the whole "lack of nip" and everything.
Non serious answer: You'll need to draw a detailed analysis of the do's and dont's of Lizard Tit in order for me to understand the lesson, teacher.
Anyway, we did agree to drop it, and leave things as they were.
(Which is fine by me, given that it leaves "Kids-TV-safe, Looney Tunes level japery" as non-questionable, and "Semirealistic naked depictions of characters that are usually clothed and cartoonish" as questionable ;)
Adroma: Well, as it is in other countries, boobs are okay if not presented in a sexual manner. I found this very funny. I love playfully rebellious art that presents controversy.
Well, as it's a site made and curated by an American, we should probably assume American publication standards.
And, in any case, it's the internet. When publishing you should assume the most stringent widespread standards need apply, and when browsing you should assume the most lax.
Describe This Image As Dramatically As Possible
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
I didn't follow the whole conflict over whether or not that Rajirra image should be labeled "questionable", but I can appreciate the fact that people were writing paragraphs and paragraphs of text analyzing how questionable cat boobs are.
- Reply
Non serious answer: You'll need to draw a detailed analysis of the do's and dont's of Lizard Tit in order for me to understand the lesson, teacher.
- Reply
- Reply
Anyway, we did agree to drop it, and leave things as they were.
(Which is fine by me, given that it leaves "Kids-TV-safe, Looney Tunes level japery" as non-questionable, and "Semirealistic naked depictions of characters that are usually clothed and cartoonish" as questionable ;)
- Reply
On the one hand they may just be muscle and fat covered bony protrusions in the thorax, so technically SFW (even if your boss doesn't think so)
On the other, maybe fat stores used for making egg yolk. Which makes it maybe-maybe not
On the turning hand, may actually be like Human Boobs and therefore Questionableable.
...now I write it out, I guess the balance of judgement is towards "stick a pineapple on it".
tl;dr It's probably safest to go with "if Kaz pixelated it in the comic, it needs a pineapple on the booru". Sing it with me now...
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
Well, as it's a site made and curated by an American, we should probably assume American publication standards.
And, in any case, it's the internet. When publishing you should assume the most stringent widespread standards need apply, and when browsing you should assume the most lax.