Makkon: I don't know what some viewer's internet diet consists of here, but be real. That is nudity, by definition. Yes, it is sexual in nature. There's no denying that it is objectively a naked cat woman being shown in an intentional angle and pose wanting to get a specific response out of people. Considering all that, I do think this has the right to exist. Even if it's not particularly tasteful, it does have merit. Does it belong here? Eh, probably not, that's ultimately up to the mods.
Makkon: @AMKitsune that's an idea. It's like the "not my problem" field from Scott Adam's Hitchhiker's Guide. It's not that you can't physically see them, it's just that it plays a trick on your brain and makes it impossible to focus on them. Functionally invisible, but not actually invisible.
Makkon: Ah. You seemed rather committed to your comment, I assumed you were serious and took it as critique. I mean, it certainly wasn't funny, so I didn't think it was a joke. No worries, 6 pages of foot studies certainly didn't hurt.
And yes, generally feet fall pretty low on the visual hierarchy when it comes to important features that the brain recognizes.
Makkon: If the worst feedback someone has is a hard angle on a character's left foot, I guess I'm doing okay.
Thanks everyone for the positive feedback, and the critique. :)
Dramatic Descriptions
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
And yes, generally feet fall pretty low on the visual hierarchy when it comes to important features that the brain recognizes.
- Reply
Thanks everyone for the positive feedback, and the critique. :)