TemporaryFace: @MetalC0Mmander: I think the tag was originally intended to refer to relatively obscure NPCs. Derkeethus, Ahnassi and Weedum-Ja are not especially important characters in their respective games.
TemporaryFace: I like it! We don't get much fan-art of Prequel's early stages anymore, let alone her voyage to Cyrodiil. I presume that book is the "Encyclopedia of Deadly Creatures?"
TemporaryFace: @Radian: ...You know, I don't know what I was thinking. For a moment there, I could have sworn Katia was in the picture somewhere, but now that I look again she's nowhere to be seen. Weird.
TemporaryFace: Note: The tags TES_Skyrim and Skyrim refer to different things. The latter refers to the northernmost Tamrielic province. The former refers to the fifth installment of the Elder Scrolls franchise.
TemporaryFace: @AMKitsune: I just noticed the 'show credits' button. Would it be possible to add a similar button below the yes/no options that similarly replaces Katia's speech bubble with the tag(s) implied by 'yes?'
TemporaryFace: @AMKitsune: Instead of logging a list of tags that updates as you go, perhaps it could display temporary blurbs telling you what tags will ultimately be added to that list according to the individual answers you select?
So, for example, I answer "Am I in the picture?" with yes, and a string saying "Katia_Managan" fades in briefly before fading out again?
TemporaryFace: I just took the time to see what questions it provides, and I'm delighted to see so many tags that I recognize and even invented! It would perhaps add to the utility, however, if you could see what tags were added, or would be added, as you answer the questions individually, instead of listing them all at the end.
TemporaryFace: "Festive_Holiday_Disaster" is for the clothes. "Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow" is for the cloak itself. What do you mean by the whole ensemble?
But okay, let's suppose we don't consolidate. Encourage rampant synonyms. Who's going to go through the 80+ pages of artwork to make sure all the entries are tagged with every possible way they can be described? I sure as hell won't. And every time someone adds a new, equivalent tag, you'll have to go all the way through again. It's just impractical.
TemporaryFace: @MetalC0Mmander: Without standardization, we get cases where the same idea is tagged differently in different pictures. Searches for that idea become incomplete and unreliable.
TemporaryFace: @Sasquatch_boote: Consolidate. Basketball can be absorbed by Sports. Lesbian Foreplay can be subsumed by Romance. You can't even see the tags that have only one or two items on the "full list" unless you navigate to the "show all" option, whereupon it just becomes a mess to sort through.
TemporaryFace: I'd remove the shameless_product_placement tag for being unique and therefore heresy, but I like it too much. Instead, let's try to tag it to as many other pictures as we can.
TemporaryFace: @reversalmushroom: "Why" you ask? Because we must. Because in the end, all that stands between orderly tagging and Oblivion is a few good men and women dedicated to preserving everything that is good and true. If ever the booru is to be freed of the tyranny of chaos, we must fight, striking down unclean tags where they occur and never shrinking from the duty thrust upon us by unkind fate. "Why," you ask? Because it is our duty.
TemporaryFace: @AMKitsune: I don't know what you're talking about. I try to make sure everything I see in the Featured Masterpiece window gets the tag.
Dramatic Descriptions
I'm not sure why it's being used here.
Not to be confused with the biggest thing she's ever ridden.
So, for example, I answer "Am I in the picture?" with yes, and a string saying "Katia_Managan" fades in briefly before fading out again?
But okay, let's suppose we don't consolidate. Encourage rampant synonyms. Who's going to go through the 80+ pages of artwork to make sure all the entries are tagged with every possible way they can be described? I sure as hell won't. And every time someone adds a new, equivalent tag, you'll have to go all the way through again. It's just impractical.
It was a lady imp, remember?