DAEDRIC FUN TIP:
If sidebar menus offend you, destroy them by clicking their header.

202: Kvatch_arena_armor armor armor_design artist:sentientsocks character:Katia_Managan painted_underwear text

Kvatch_arena_armor armor armor_design artist:sentientsocks character:Katia_Managan painted_underwear text

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: I'm pretty confident that this is Sentientsocks, I recognize that artstyle.

2016: Katia's_measurements Kvatch_arena_armor artist:Mediocre_Scrublord character:Katia_Managan mathematics tavia's_shop_storage_room text

Katia's_measurements Kvatch_arena_armor artist:Mediocre_Scrublord character:Katia_Managan mathematics tavia's_shop_storage_room text
showing 10 of 13 comments

- Reply
tronn: Oh, this isn't by me but an anon from /co/. I just upload the things.

- Reply
AMKitsune: @tjk: Also, she doesn't really measure things as she seems quite happy 'guestimating' distances by eye, so we probably shouldn't take her 'measurements' as fact.

- Reply
Mediocre_Scrublord: @tronn the anon 'twas me. ME.
how else could you explain the pixels?

- Reply
POMA: Scrubleader confirmed to be the only human being that uses pixelated brushes.

- Reply
Sasquatch_boote: Scrubleader confirmed as the pixel wizard. All shall pixel and despair.

- Reply
Mediocre_Scrublord: Thank you, mortals.
Your reverence has been noted.

- Reply
Man_Of_Mer: Do not fall under his guise! He is but a false god! Just a mortal man he is!

- Reply
Mediocre_Scrublord: Cast out this heathen.

- Reply
Eating: m- muh head-canon... muh head-canon

- Reply
ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: You are gonna have to put some trig into this, due to the fact that its facing at an angle.

2227: Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow Katia's_Thief_Tunic Khajiit character:Katia_Managan

Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow Katia's_Thief_Tunic Khajiit character:Katia_Managan
showing 10 of 11 comments

- Reply
Kewot_Rokar: Wot

- Reply
Tahrey: EVERYTHING IS O-KAY.

- Reply
Tahrey: *accidentally clicks on image*
OH SHIT EVERYTHING IS _ENORMOUS_

- Reply
Valkaiser: You rasterized your beautiful vector art?
Those are ten seconds you will never get back! D:

- Reply
Tahrey: > 3675 x 5500 pixels
> jpg
> lineart
> somehow only 775kb with no visible artefacting on 100% zoom

what sorcery is this?

- Reply
Valkaiser: @Tahrey: It's a png.

- Reply
Tahrey: Ah, the "mis-reporting as JPG" thing you were on about?

That might explain why Google Deep Dream (which demands jpeg-standard input...) balked at least once when presented with a pic downloaded from here...

- Reply
Tahrey: Oh, fwiw, as we were on the subject, that's 60 to 80mb once decompressed into 24 or 32bit colour, respectively o_O

My older phone very rarely had more than about 100mb of RAM to spare (seeing as it only 576 in total), so trying to load this pic may well have caused it to crash...

There can't be THAT many colours in it, however. Anyone know if PNG still decompresses to truecolour in a web browser if you save it with reduced colour depth (e.g. 256 colours / 8 bit, thus a more manageable 20mb, and still a plenty large enough palette for all the block colours plus shading and antialiasing)?

- Reply
Nate_Assassin: 1. It's PNG.
2. Don't even know what rasterized means
3. I was too lazy to resize it

- Reply
Tahrey: 1. Yeah, I got the message already.

2. "Changed from a vector image (described as a series of lines and fills with exceptionally high resolution and smooth scaling) to a bitmap (ie made of a limited number of pixels)". A holdover from the CRT days when you had a choice between displays that used vector mapping (the beam location could be freely moved to any point on the screen, turned on, and then swept across to another...), or more TV-style ones which scanned across a regular series of horizontal lines, turning on and off at regular intervals to describe discontinuous strips of pixels. These lines being called, for reasons I do not ken the wot of, "Rasters". Thus taking an image designed for display on a pixelised device and manipulating it for output on a vector one instead was "vectorisation", and the reverse was "rasterisation". And as CRT raster displays came to be the dominant tech, followed by their LCD children, the term has stuck. Though you could use "pixelated" for more accuracy, that would actually be less clear as the term is more generally used to describe something that's of of excessively poor resolution and far too obviously made of square blocks.

3. Please, think of the children. Yknow, the ones who'll be trying to view this on low-memory devices with small displays. InsaneRez is all well and good if we want to print it out, and it does preserve a very clean record of your excellent vectoring work, but it's otherwise of no use to anyone as I've yet to run across anywhere selling a monitor large enough to show the entire pic without some kind of downscaling. Unless of course the idea is to show it on an experimental 100+ inch Super Hi-Vision 8K panel... turned landscape.

I mean, how did you even make it so high rez in the first place? If you drew it in a vector program but then chose to save to PNG, did it not give you a dpi option?

I'd suggest for uploading here, if it originally said, say, 600dpi (for a 6 1/8" by 9 1/6" canvas, or an 8.5 x 11 one with some whitespace borders that got automatically cropped), you maybe try 150 to 200 next time (919x1375 to 1225x1833) which will still look just as good in almost any circumstance. 300 if you really want to stay committed to the hi-rez cause (...as it'll still reduce the memory load by 75%)

2239: 4chan Katia's_wizard_robe My_Little_Pony artist:Man_Of_Mer character:Katia_Managan crossover double_amputee green_eyes knock_off

4chan Katia's_wizard_robe My_Little_Pony artist:Man_Of_Mer character:Katia_Managan crossover double_amputee green_eyes knock_off
showing 10 of 12 comments

- Reply
CaptainLackwit: Ah, now there's an old meme.

- Reply
OppoQuinn: Absolutely disgusting.

- Reply
Man_Of_Mer: @Armored-Struggle-Wagon: But I don't work here. Do you have something against bronies?

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: @Man_Of_Mer: No! It's just a joke :p

- Reply
Man_Of_Mer: Few. Ok. Don't need another antibrony out there, you know how that ends.

- Reply
MikeyTheFox: @Man_Of_Mer: Don't worry! Your favorite Foxy admin is also too a Brownie :D (yes I meant to spell it like that)

- Reply
Tahrey: Out. The both of you.

Mikey, pass your mods down to ASW.

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: @Tahrey: inb4 massive fucking comments war

- Reply
Skoon: Katia hasn't gotten her cutie mark.

True plotline of prequel revealed.

- Reply
Tahrey: ASW: That's kind of why I had to order them out.

2240: Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow Mortal_Kombat artist:Baz1S character:Katia_Managan crossover magic_fire

Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow Mortal_Kombat artist:Baz1S character:Katia_Managan crossover magic_fire

- Reply
Baz1S: Oops wrong image, can someone delete this one?

- Reply
Baz1S: Normal version http://imgur.com/PnyX9kw

- Reply
AMKitsune: There you go.

- Reply
Baz1S: @AMKitsune Thanks. This is my first drawing, so I'll be glad to get some criticism. Please feel free to say how bad it is.

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: @Baz1S: well, it's not /that/ bad, I can't even draw Katia's head without tracing it :p

- Reply
Geravind: =O_o= Lu Kang?... Well Katia looks awkwardly in that pose. Ah, it's normal for Katia. She even uses her big tail to keep the balance.
Nice coloring.

- Reply
Tahrey: Fire-dragon-ball? Hadoukamehameha?

- Reply
Kewot_Rokar: Hadouken!

- Reply
Baz1S: @Geravind: Я пытался в точности повторить его позу. http://i.imgur.com/WroWMFW.jpg / I was trying to completely copy his pose.@Salamanakis: Thank you! I'm glad you like it.

- Reply
Geravind: @Baz1S: Извини, дело не в тебе -- Катенька часто выглядит нелепо, когда... эммм... "не в своей тарелке".

2237: Khajiit TES_Morrowind TES_Skyrim armor artist:Geravind character:your_weird_OC claws inconsistent_rendering knock_off screenshot shield text

Khajiit TES_Morrowind TES_Skyrim armor artist:Geravind character:your_weird_OC claws inconsistent_rendering knock_off screenshot shield text

- Reply
Geravind: Context: the guard of the caravan met a formidable opponent for once...

Critics inbound...

- Reply
Radian: @Geravind: Критиковать то особо нечего. Очевидных косяков невидно. Можно придраться к отсутствию светотени и к тому, что это скорее коллаж чем рисунок.

- Reply
CaptainLackwit: Oh christ this vaguely reminds me of that time in Morrowind that a naked Nord beat me, a man in full plate with a two handed sword, to death. With his bare hands.

- Reply
DestinedFateX: "And then, son, I was raped in the ass."

- Reply
DestinedFateX: @DestinedFateX: "THE END"

- Reply
Geravind: Как обычно, пришёл поручик... и не к месту рассказал о своём горьком заднем опыте.
Говнотролли такие говнотролли.
Намёк был на то, что в Скуриме при отличном владении щитом -- противника физ-дамагера можно забить даже без оружия.

- Reply
tronn: thorny_khajiit_dick.tiff

- Reply
Radian: @Geravind: Пощади людей которые это будут гуглом переводить :D
А в скайрим я играл по этому принципу: http://acomics.ru/~latest-scrolls/15 только за страшного орка.
Again without translation, sorry :|

- Reply
Kewot_Rokar: This is... Wierdishly good. It just doesn't look normal with Morrowind and Skyrim things, but it isn't bad!

- Reply
Geravind: @Kewot_Rokar: Oh, this one just likes that armor set very much. :3

This khajiit (by the story line) came from Morrovind to this cold land and had to reassemble with his brethren cause of stupid racism around...

2230: Crossover_Collab adorable artist:Valkaiser casually_underdressed character:Katia_Managan very_casually_underdressed

Crossover_Collab adorable artist:Valkaiser casually_underdressed character:Katia_Managan very_casually_underdressed
showing 10 of 38 comments

- Reply
Tahrey: OK, tried again, both in Chrome with all extensions turned off, and in Internet Explorer (this machine only has those two browsers). No change in Chrome. And it didn't work at all in IE. Like, it didn't display embedded in the regular page, and when I clicked "image only" it displayed the xml contents of the file as if it were a text document (...and showed it as having a name that ended in "_jpg.mht", rather than the ".svg?" of Chrome... and yes, knocking off the "?" didn't do anything either).

Said XML may reveal why it didn't work though I think - the interactivity / state machine lurking within appears to be driven by javascript. Maybe, for security reasons, that doesn't load when you're just viewing an image by itself rather than within the context of a whole page, and the display engine gets rather confused as a result?

- Reply
Tahrey: ...in fact when I right click on the embedded image (in Chrome) and try to "save as", it presents as a piece of HTML rather than an SVG file...

- Reply
Tahrey: (ergo, maybe the browser is trying to display it as an html page and thus failing, as if you hold it to those standards it's rather badly malformed, being merely a module/fragment/object rather than an entire correctly-formatted page?)

- Reply
Valkaiser: @Tahrey: What I mean is, the image board software is somehow confusing the browser. I can view the plain svg file with my browser just fine. I can even rename it to an html and it works. I set up my own image board using the same software that this one is based on and it works (this is mainly why I think it should work).

...but in the source for this page, the "Image Only" button is just a form element that directly links the image when clicked. It should work.

The same problem happens with the other two SVGs I uploaded here, which have no embedded javascript or CSS, so that isn't it.

I'll have to run some more experiments when I return home.

@Tahrey: I think vector graphics are receiving new attention due to the explosion of mobile devices and the need for crisp graphics at multiple screen sizes.

- Reply
Valkaiser: Now that I'm thinking about it. The version of the booru I'm using retrieves images via PHP. This booru doesn't appear to. Maybe this booru is running an older version of Shimmie2? I wonder how I could find out...

- Reply
Valkaiser: I think I figured it out! The HTTP response header generated when retrieving the SVG via the "image only" button (in this case, linking directly to "http://www.prequeladventure.com/fanartbooru/_images/fdc6078861a74f5e831439f9da10e0ad/2230%20-%20Crossover_Collab%20Katia_Managan%20adorable%20artist%3AValkaiser%20casually_underdressed%20very_casually_underdressed.svg") incorrectly specifies the "Content-Type" field as "image/jpeg". This confuses the browser as it correctly receives the SVG data and then tries to parse it as a jpeg file. The "Content-Type" that should be reported is "image/svg+xml".

I demand satisfaction!!! >:V

- Reply
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: yay.

- Reply
Valkaiser: The same thing happens with other image files, such as PNGs, but the browser is smart enough to recognize that it isn't really a jpeg.

This could be caused by your web server configuration. As you appear to be running Apache, this might cause it:
<Location /fanartbooru/_images>
ForceType image/jpeg
</Location>

Of course, I am making wild assumptions based on whatever little gobbets of info I can scrape from your web server.

- Reply
Valkaiser: Err, wait. Webserver looks more like nginx 1.8.0.
I don't know anything about configuring that then.
I should be like, drawing or something.
Yeah, the arts...

- Reply
Tahrey: You, sir, are a gentleman and a polymath. Or madam/lady if that's more appropriate. Excellent investigative work, anyway.
First | Prev | Random | Next | Last
<< 620 | 621 | 622 | 623 | 624 | 625 | 626 | 627 | 628 | 629 | 630 >>