DAEDRIC FUN TIP:
Brevity is the soul of wit. In essence, make anything the comes from your whelpling fingers be succinct, and that you don't overstay your welcome. Writing for too long can...
2902: /v/ 4chan character:Katia_Managan knock_off smiling
2900: Colored Kvatch_arena_armor angry artist:unknown_victor character:Katia_Managan knock_off looking_badass
|
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: Excellent work! I approve!
- Reply
BadReligion: @Tahrey: That we care about her is worst kind of hypocrisy...
My "golden" thing, just ignore.
ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: @BadReligion: I don't care about hypocrisy, I care about my fiction khajiit waifu!!
|
2904: Khajiit Kvatch_arena_armor PREQUEL_title accidents_happen artist:Bhoren booze character:Katia_Managan drunk text wallpaper
|
Bhoren: This wallpaper is somehow a joke: a friend sent me a screenshot from Oblivion including a ton of booze and a Khajiit (you can find it in the source), I thought this would make a great prequel wallpaper !
|
2893: Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow Katia's_Thief_Tunic Kvatch artist:Radian character:Katia_Managan redraw
|
Radian: I've seen this so much so I decide to redraw it.
Also you don't mind if I will redraw (and post) some other pages? I suck at backgrounds so it good way to practice.
Geravind: "I suck with backgrounds"? Мне тут как раз бэкфон нравится больше всего.
Неок-и: - мешочек на вывеске похож на котелок или тыкву, не на мешочек; - формат деталей лица слишком большой -- если преувеличенную саму голову можно списать на пушистость, то тут заметно ненормально большое лицо отн. остального тельца; - выражение эмоции... в оригинале читается "мне предстоит некоторое рискованное дерьмо, жаль, не вернусь сюда больше", а здесь "а потом я всё равно вернусь и съем тебя, чёртова торговка!". Тень/освещение, как всегда, хорошо.
Geravind: @Radian:
Mods, please, edit his prep "at" to "with" and remove THIS message, ASAP. English is dangerous to learn.
Radian: @Geravind: Ну, тут фон нормальный потому что я на него потратил больше времени чем на саму Катю.
Мешочек фиговый и голова крупновата, согласен (хотя в оригинале пропорции схожи). А вот про выражение лица не знаю, что там что тут - довольно нейтральное лицо, ничего особо не выражающее. Может дело в несколько другой позе? Еще мне кажется что я с перспективой накосячил. |
2898: Kvatch_arena_armor artist:unknown_victor character:Katia_Managan monochrome sketch
|
ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: Looks like some ones ass is about to get kicked.
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: Good work, Victor!
|
2888: artist:POMA character:Rajirra monochrome sketch text very_casually_underdressed
|
Geravind: Воу! РОМА-стайл тоже detected!
Столько мышечных линий... =*_*= И волосики тоже прикольно получились. Как же я по ней скучаю. =т_т=
Armored-Struggle-Wagon: For all we know, it could be H2SO4! although there would be a lot less fur, (and flesh, for that matter)...
Tahrey: Wet fur contest?
Also, it may even be a dilute solution of C2H6O in H2O, with a small amount of other electrolyte compounds. Then we'd really be in trouble. |
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=0z39mhyAt9g
2890: artist:Radian character:Katia_Managan green_eyes portrait very_casually_underdressed
|
Geravind: Радик-стайл detected.
Похоже, что слева дневной свет, а справа свечение пруда маны из таинственной пещеры. Для уфка и дюнделя немного заяркие цвета взял -- я сам вот (в след. арте) пытаюсь подобрать кхаджиту правильный цвет языка. У реальных котэ, оказывается, он довольно яркий. Она тут выглядит такой небольшой, но довольно крепенькой комплекции (не могу объяснить). С минуту смотрел на неё... -- василиск или змея. У неё тут такой гипнотизирующий взгляд. =@_@= @POMA: Razor accident? Don't dare! Fluffy is okay.
Kewot_Rokar: Lovely. Well done!
katiaaitak: That's pretty cool!
- Reply
AGMsInbound: Nice work! I love the way you do fur in all your Prequel work.
|
2785: Cloak_of_Gray_Tomorrow artist:Prophet_Lord blind_eyes character:Katia_Managan snow
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
...oh right, just took off the invisibility hood.
And, well, 3000x3000 is hard to deal with on a normal size monitor, but it's not any much bigger than a typical digital photo these days, and means you can print it smoothly if you should so wish :)
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
- Reply
The minimum that you should really aim for in print is about 180dpi (which also tends to be the breakpoint between 9 and 24 pin dot matrix printers, which is why you could never really get satisfactory output from the former). Certainly below 150 it gets noticeably blocky or blurry (especially in that rather obvious blurred-pixel way) when you get up close to it. On the other hand there's little point going much beyond 300-360, but it's always possible to downscale and drop some detail that no-one will see anyway; upscaling is much more of a problem.
However, 3000 pixels at 180dpi is still 16.7 inches (42cm) on a side, or squared-off A2 size, and the largest home/small office printers tend to top out at about 11 inches width and maybe 17 inches length capacity (for A3 printing, and whatever the equivalent US upsize from Letter/Legal is), so you could likely get away with cropping this a little and printing it within those borders. Maybe at 200dpi instead, for 15x15 equivalent full size, and less cropping to fit on the page.
- Reply
If you're having trouble viewing this due to it's size, there is the [Fit Both] option on the side menu under Image Controls.
This is at 300dpi. Perfectly suitable for a 10x10in (25.4x25.4cm) print. You could probably print even bigger than that, but that's going above the intended size, so quality will decrease. You'd need to go and use a professional level printer (which, I mean, 11x17in prints at office max are only like $1-2 I think). You'd have to trim the paper obviously.
I did this for fun and as style practice. This was never intended to be a poster or a wallpaper, I was simply stating that you could use it as such if you were so inclined.
If you'd like a different size (taller/wider/larger), you can always hire me. Until then, please enjoy this free piece of artwork I have provided for you.
- Reply
Think I was trying to talk through both sides of the argument to show they each had valid points and that it's more a matter of opinion than anything, to try and squash any potential further squabbling?
3k on a side is big even for a 4k screen (as they're 16:9 not 5:4), but everything we really need to see is well within the action-safe area so it can be cropped down happily and should still look alright scaled up, and certainly scaled down to any arbitrary sub-4k resolution (as the step size will be large enough to prevent any dramatic aliasing effects). Could even trim it to portrait aspect, possibly.
But at the same time, it's about the minimum that you could get away with for large-scale printing, IE bigger than a typical piece of desktop printer paper (which is usually 8 to 8.5 inches wide). Even for A4 or Letter you don't want anything less than 2mpx (1600x1200 or 1920x1080) else it'll look obviously blocky or blurred at normal viewing distance. As the sizes go up, so do the necessary resolutions, though it's not necessarily linear as the larger an image the further away you tend to view it from.
And yeah, there's the scaling button, but that's not immediately obvious, especially if you're not looking for it, and it doesn't default to "fit both", but "no scaling" instead. Personally I just leave it as the latter and drag the picture to the address bar anyway, as that gives a large-as-possible view divorced of all the other screen clutter (especially if fullscreened), and it's still got to download the same amount of data and take up the same amount of space in memory either way.
The latter points being maybe more important, and why it may be better to upload a more normal-sized pic to the booru but link it to a full size version somewhere else (e.g. Imgur). Not only does it save bandwidth for Kaz's server, but it makes life much easier for anyone browsing from lower end hardware (old laptop, cheaper smartphone or tablet) or using a low-speed or monthly bandwidth capped connection.
- Reply
And I'd at one time have been quite interested to find somewhere I could do 11x17 (or more pertinently A3) size prints for that price, except I can now do them effectively for free at work, and even if I was paying for them it'd be considerably less. The finish might not be quite as good, but if the idea is to hang it up then it can either be laminated or put in a cheap glass poster-frame...
(And then there's the "A0" (34-inch) inkjet plotter in the library that will spit out something four times the size for about £8 ... which may seem a lot but when you consider how many normal sheet would have to be collaged together to produce the same result, is well worth it. You do have to submit an image of entirely ludicrous resolution for it to look any good though, and most particularly for any text to be readable; 150dpi is about 7000x5000...)