Geravind: Хы, ещё Катя от Помы!
Эти глаза... =@_@= Да она прям в душу заглядывает. (Помыч-негодник опять испытывает на Кхаджите свои психотропные арты!) Кхаджит уже хочет ей помочь независимо от её целей.
Ой, а где сиси?

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: :3 such a cutie

DistantRoarOfWar: *inserts pun into cat*

Geravind: @DistantRoarOfWar: Your screen is flooded with cat tears and your keyboard is burnt.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: Gah its even cuter now!

Streetwind: I thought Cat Expert was fine at 3/6 with its effect... I mean, Fen Creeper is a 3/6 taunt for 5, and it's being played in Arena. Okay, not in Constructed, but that's largely because taunts matter less there.

For Cat Expert to have an additional effect, even as little as summoning one 1/1 Beast token, without increasing the card cost already makes it fine for a class card. As a Hunter, the Beast tribe of the token enables other class cards like Ram Wrangler, Hound Master and Kill Command. And with 6 health, you are likely to get more than one token, if the opponent doesn't decide to burn hard removal on it.

A 4/6 taunt for 5 that spawns tokens with Charge is too much IMHO. Unless you specifically want a card that's really high above the curve. Blizzard occasionally does release those even though they should know better... (Hello Dr. Boom). Also compare Imp Gang Boss: a 2/4 class card for 3 that spawns 1/1 tokens without charge. Ostensibly that is a statline comparable to 4/6 for 5, but it's missing the taunt. Having taunt always results in reduced stats, except for 1-cost minions. The higher health you go, the more stats you lose to taunt. So, a 6-health taunt minion having a statline comparable to a non-taunt minion with a strictly worse effect, which is still considered a must-play for a lot of decks, is really a red flag balance-wise.

Wild Hunt needs more help, IMHO. It's a strictly worse Feign Death, since it triggers your opponent's rattles as well (and they'll be positive for him in 9 out of 10 cases). And Feign Death costs only 2 mana, not 3, while still not seeing much play outside gimmick decks.

notabigthreat: Fen Creeper is a truly awful card in constructed.
Given the hunter class, we can already assume it's not arena.
Exploiting the Charge would require attacking minions anyway, which is an activity foreign to hunters. Subtracting one attack should do the trick.

Wild Hunt might be a bit weak though, even with that Ancestral Spirit.
Another change then. http://imgur.com/9mptYjT

notabigthreat: I BESEECH AN ADMIN (is this how it works? any declaration of beseechment to sign? to sign with what then?)

AMKitsune: @notabigthreat: Admin beseeched. What can I do ya for?

notabigthreat: Observably, the image is one behind what I write in its comments, so have this picture of booru behaving all normal. http://imgur.com/OeLHcvY

notabigthreat: How many administrators does it take to choose the right link? Argh why can't we even change the images ourselves

Kazerad: @notabigthreat: I don't usually moderate, but I'll try! Did I pick the right link?

notabigthreat: Please, be careful in future. We don't need more INES sevens.

AMKitsune: @notabigthreat: There. Hopefully that's the right one this time. In the future, you'd be better of using the 'report image' button to request a replacement (as we're far more likely to see a flagged image than a URL in a potential wall of text). As far as replacing your own images goes, this is a booru and just like other boorus, it's built for uploading images and commenting on them. Not much more than that. That's the role of 'social art sites' like Deviantart and Furaffinity.

notabigthreat: Alright, I've learned my lesson that reporting is preferred in such situations, and ironic moderation does not necessarily mean someone swapped our graphite for a transition metal.

Decimus: bruh

Vidiotdragon: Actually I think the painting of the leaves is the best bit in this.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: @Vidiotdragon: He did tell me that he had fun doing the background. It's a very pretty scene all together if you as me :3

Adroma: *thinks about romancing battle partner who is a kitty cat*

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: She will be romanced !!!!

Geravind: A real battle isn't romantic, it's fucking unforgettable ugly: eyes fly to one direction, teeth to other, intestines fall down to one's feet. You can't even realize at once, that the one, you have just talked to an hour ago, is no more.
Sorry for the bitter truth. The art looks actually more romantic.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: @Geravind: But surviving a brutal fight together will bring them closer than ever.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: I tagged this as 'romance' because this is a ship, it's my post, my art, my decision.

Geravind: Her pupils should be placed just where those bigger gleams are -- she's not supposed to look silly and confused here, yes? And the whole image says like "who's next?" or "I'm ready for challenge".

Vidiotdragon: Race fast safe Cat

SameButDifferent: Pretty unique combination. Reminds me of that one with the DOTA 2 Heroes playing hockey.

DistantRoarOfWar: Of course racing cars wouldn't backfire disastrously. Nope. It totally wouldn't.

Ladas2: Just some random drawing. It looks better on paper, because the scanner does not scan outlines so good. that I had to fix it.

SameButDifferent: Cutie!

DistantRoarOfWar: Now ink it :D

AMKitsune: That face is simply adorable! Those eyes especially. So shiny!

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: omg, cuteness overflow!

DistantRoarOfWar: Those abs though. Katia's been working out. Or this an OC?

bluedraggy: Well, she does have hair again too, so it's at least safe to assume that this is well after her 'present day'. Noodley arms also non-noodley. Of course, it could also be just a dream.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: @DistantRoarOfWar: Khajiit's are pretty fit already, even though she has noodle arms she still managed to repel down a rope, and jump up buildings.

DistantRoarOfWar: @ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: Nonetheless, love me some abs on a girl.

Armored-Struggle-Wagon: Good work, 'hon! ;3

Geravind: Прикона! =*_*=
Хавайся -- сейчас нобигут Радианы с радиаметрами и скажут, что ты не очень смог в мышцы. =>_<=
Размер головы(лица)/длина шеи/ширина плеч -- что-то тут не так ("само дерево жужжать не может").
Скулы (смысле сама кость) не могут заканчиваться аж позади ушей.
Личико прикольное, уфко тоже, и причёска так ничё (самый задний каскад волос, вроде, таким широким быть не может, но "жираф большоооой" -- Кхаджиту отсюда не видней).

Вообще это не Сигрид... но тварь схожего характера -- хорошо получилось отобразить.
"Ущелье" между сисей не должно так высоко отн. видимого их низа -- либо вырез одежды глубже делай, либо не растягивай так анатомию.

Молодец, который раз завидую твоим стремлениям!

Geravind: @Geravind: ...ух, прости, пожалуйста. Про "жирафа" это было к слову, а не по поводу изображённого персонажа -- так цинично таких авторов Кхаджит никогда не говнотроллит. =-_-=

Ja_Jarsha_Rovandi: Needs more Karma.

*mutters* god damn thief.

Radian: Раз уж про меня сказали придется набигать. Сам недавно закончил пачку стадиков с лицами и могу с уверенностью сказать что лица это та еще задница (don't try to translate it :P)
Bunch of critique: Итак. Шея длинная и тонкая и входить она должна в затылок а не в челюсть. Собственно челюсть заканчивается в основании уха, само ухо чуть ниже. Лицо как мне кажется слишком широкое. Глаза пожалуй самая косячная часть, они слишком широкие (хотя это можно списать на стилизацию). Если ты хотел сделать их приоткрытыми добавь сверху складки века (у правого глаза нечто подобное есть но не там). Нос в принципе правильный, но он не совсем женский. Ухо "внутри" чутка накосячено. Выше про скулы уже сказали. И ключицы сильно угловатые, особенно посередине. C-c-combo
Про губы пожалуй промолчу, они вроде нормальные и у меня самого они сейчас вызывают больше всего боли в заду.
Еще в глаза бросается разный стиль носа и уха.
Могу сделать быстрооверпайнт.

Geravind: @Radian: Ухо по высоте на нужном месте -- тут лицо чуть наклонено вперёд.

Про определение той самой неуловимой точки соединения головы с шеей при рисовании придумал целое правило.
1) При рисовании человека: первый отрезок соединяет середину ушей, второй отрезок начинается от середины носа (между кончиком и переносицей) и пересекает первый отрезок посередине; второй отрезок в точке их пересечения делится в соотношении 7/2 или 3,5/1; окончание второго отрезка и есть искомая точка.
2) При рисовании кхаджита: первый отрезок соединяет точки крепления челюсти ("ага, умник... ты хоть сам их найти можешь?"); второй отрезок начинается от кончика носа. Далее аналогично.

Кхаджит не виноват -- объяснил, как смог. Надеюсь, хоть кому-то поможет. =-_-=
Так можно легко "видеть" шею и сопоставлять с остальными размерностями, даже если она полностью закрыта в выбранном ракурсе.

Filthypaladin: DUD

forestOverlord: Sweet Katia and Hella Magnus?

SameButDifferent: The sun in the corner is that one sun baby from Teletubbies a few decades later after some very poor life choices and questionable substance usage

Vidiotdragon: That is one swood cat...

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: @Vidiotdragon:
Swood

Vidiotdragon: @ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: Exactly.

Geravind: Very egyptian muzzle for a kitty.
And nice coloring, yay!

Ja_Jarsha_Rovandi: Seems like an older Katia, somehow. Good to see her survive her tenure as Kazerad's punching dakimakura.

ThatGuyWithAKhajiitWaifu: I think it looks cute :o

Tahrey: Actually, cancel that. I've gone back and checked now...

This frame:


...is actually followed by one where the pixelation is removed following the gang boss noting that she's a reptile and therefore there's nothing really sexual about her chest. IE it's basically a bit like a human wearing an alligator-skin shirt.

So, in that case, carry on.

(However, my point still stands about the other stuff being pixelated - Kat was still censored until she applied the paint, etc... and QW PD was at least censored at first until that point was cleared up in story. So care still needs to be taken.)

((I'm not touching the bit about her apparently being "about 15", btw. You can fight amongst yourselves over that, and whether age, and particularly the difference between being adult and being underage, would make a difference between QW potentially being censored even though PD ultimately wasn't))

bluedraggy: Best definition available of what is questionable:
1 - Do mods mark it as questionable?
If true, it's questionable.
If false, it's not questionable.
Problem solved! Tadaaa!

Kazerad: @bluedraggy: one of them made a mod chatroom at some point where basically all they do is argue about nippleless breasts.

-Uzi_Man-: @bluedraggy: No, that's oligarchy. What if a mod marks something as questionable but nobody else thinks it is? It wouldn't be fair, so it's better to leave the tagging to the whole community.

The problem is that the concept of "questionable" is ambiguous as hell because everyone is going to have different understandings of it and how it applies to different pics. That's why there should be a better, clearer, more concrete definition / rule about questionability so that there's no room for ambiguity or "muh opinions".

I know that this entire topic is so utterly unimportant that it literally hurts the soul to argue about it, but if we leave it unsolved, it's going to bring up even more arguments in the long run, and nobody wants that.

Geravind: @Kazerad: It's a very important part of their duties...

*sarcasm mode enabled*
- Son, what are you doing on that weird website so long?
- Don't interrupt, mom, we're discussing acceptability of nippleless breasts on the fanartbooru.
- Oh, sorry, -- that's very important for whole humankind, carry on.
*sarcasm mode disabled*

God, save this fucking world.

Tahrey: bluedraggy: Works for me. At least then we can join forces to bitch at the mods instead of fighting with each other.

Kaz, Gera: Lol, internet. Were any of them (n)-chan mods in ages past?
Also, the internet is fuelled by stupid arguments and flamewars, they create the high pressure hot air that keeps it from collapsing in on itself. Without them it would self destruct within a matter of hours.

Were either of you around back in the days when Usenet / Newsgroups (as opposed to web-based fora) were a major part of the internet experience? Because, man, the pointless flaming that went on there... the bills that were racked up on charged-by-the-minute modem connections that you forgot to disconnect whilst writing your replies... oi vey.

Uzi_Man: I know you're probably after making things fairer and more democratic over all, but this isn't a democracy, I'm afraid. Most webforums aren't. You're always at the whim of the board owner and their appointed moderators. Deal with it.

The rules can sometimes be open to change if a great enough proportion of the userbase think they're drastically unfair and start petitioning for their alteration en masse, or there's a suggestion box that gets a continual trickle of "it might be a good idea if..." submissions from different people, or everyone just starts leaving... but, I think you're probably out on your own with the changes you wanted made.

Feel free to mooch on over to 8chan and set up a board there though ... in fact, it might even be a good thing to have a semioffical outlet for more... adult... Prequel fanarts that isn't hardlinked to this one ;) - then no-one can reasonably complain about their stuff being rejected, or slapped with an NSFW warning they think is unfair, because they can always be directed to that board instead via a PM or something.

-Uzi_Man-: Democracy isn't such a big deal in this case: just let the community as a whole do the tagging and it's all done. The only thing that needs to be re-defined is the questionability standards, so that they're more concrete and specific rather than merely "using our discretion", because that leaves it very open to interpretation. It would be helpful to establish a basis to which we can refer to when tagging pictures, unless you think that people enjoy arguing about these things, which so far has been shown to be quite the contrary.

The rules aren't "unfair", they simply could be done better in order to avoid unnecessary arguments. I'm just making the suggestion, and if people want to argue endlessly about the questionability of all the pics that are about to come in the future, then why bother, but it would be pretty fucking stupid to not prefer a one-time immediate solution that will help us put an end to these discussions.

Tahrey: That already happens anyway, anyone who's logged in can tag or untag an image. But presumably the mods are able to set/unset and lock certain tags, and warn/ban anyone who's abusing it.

But yeah, straight rules would be good. Can someone bring up the illustrated posting guide (and maybe the tagging one) for us again, to show whether or not they already exist?

Adroma: Don't mind me just going hunting shirtless.

Tahrey: #justamazonthings